TY - Jour A2 - Petrakis，Panos V. Au - Sihag，Ram Chander PY - 2018 DA - 2018/12/13 TI - 测量粉碎机效率的一些未解决的问题：通过实验测试和评估不同方法的预测力 -3904973 VL - 2018年 - 粉丝师效率的知识在（i）天然植物社区的互相专业化程度的推导方面有价值，（ii）在A中最大授粉所需的粉尘授予者所需的最佳授粉植物人口，（iii）可持续农业的粉刷风险评估。早期的研究人员使用了许多直接和间接的方法来测量花游客的授粉效率（PE）。然而，在这种术语的使用中存在巨大的歧义，这需要其新的审查。我重新测试了可用的三种标准方法以找到粉丝器的效率。这些包括比较（i）被移除和存放的花粉颗粒数量;（ii）由单身和访问者的多次访问产生的种子集;（iii）“花粉转移效率（PTE）”来自访客的觅食行为和丰富。在印度西北部的农产品系统中的四种植物物种的访客中记录了观察。 These plants represented a wide variety of the floral types across the angiosperms. The first two methods, namely, the “number of pollen grains removed and deposited” and the “seed set resulting from a single and the multiple visits,” were appropriate in finding differences between the efficiency ranks of the pollinators of those flowers where the number of deposited pollen grains was less than the number of ovules in the ovary. However, these two methods completely failed in situations where exactly reverse condition of pollen grains and ovules existed. Thus, these two methods of measuring the PE of visitors had limited approach and lacked a universal application over the entire angiosperm taxa. On the other hand, use of “pollen transfer efficiency”, derived from the foraging behavior and abundance of the visitors, seemed to have an edge over the other two methods as this was helpful in finding differences between the efficiency ranks of the pollinators of plants in all the three situations tested in this study. However, validation of all the three methods through the plant reproductive potential seemed to be an integral confirmatory step for drawing inferences about the efficiency of pollinators. SN - 1687-9708 UR - https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3904973 DO - 10.1155/2018/3904973 JF - International Journal of Ecology PB - Hindawi KW - ER -